Go‑karting should be fun, not life‑altering. If a ride in Breezy Point ended with injuries, Metro Law Offices can help you understand your rights and pursue fair compensation under Minnesota law. Track operators, equipment suppliers, and careless riders all have duties to keep others safe. When those duties are ignored, medical bills, lost income, and pain can follow. Our personal injury law firm supports injured Minnesotans with clear guidance and steady communication, from the first call to resolution. We focus on building strong, fact‑driven claims so you can focus on healing and getting life back on track.
Every case begins with listening—how the crash happened, what the facility required, the condition of the karts and helmets, and what injuries you now face. We then evaluate insurance coverage, track policies, and Minnesota liability rules to chart the best path forward. Whether your incident occurred at a seasonal attraction, private event, or a family outing around Breezy Point, the same principles apply: timely evidence, careful documentation, and an advocacy plan tailored to your goals. If you are unsure where to start, a conversation with our team can bring clarity, direction, and a realistic plan for recovery.
Go‑kart cases often involve overlapping issues—premises safety, product defects, and rider conduct. Insurance carriers may move quickly to shape the narrative and minimize payouts. Having a law firm handle communications, preserve evidence, and guide medical documentation can balance the scales. We work to identify all liable parties, quantify every category of loss, and keep deadlines on track. The right strategy can improve settlement leverage, reduce stress, and prevent common pitfalls such as premature statements or incomplete records. In short, focused representation gives you room to recover while your case is built the right way.
Metro Law Offices is a Minnesota personal injury law firm committed to clear communication, diligent casework, and practical results. We regularly help injured people in communities like Breezy Point navigate the realities of insurance, liability, and damages. Our approach is simple: investigate thoroughly, explain options plainly, and advocate for an outcome aligned with your needs. From negotiating with insurers to preparing cases for court, we stay focused on details that matter—maintenance logs, incident reports, witness accounts, and medical support. You deserve attentive counsel that treats your case with care, urgency, and respect.
Go‑kart injury claims are grounded in negligence principles. Operators must maintain safe tracks, provide suitable safety gear, and keep equipment in good condition. Manufacturers and rental companies must offer products that are reasonably safe for their intended use. Riders should operate karts responsibly and follow posted rules. When a breach of duty leads to harm, Minnesota law allows injured people to seek compensation for medical treatment, lost wages, and other losses. Determining who is responsible requires fact‑specific analysis, which often includes on‑site conditions, policy terms, and the actions of everyone involved.
Documentation is often decisive. Photos of the scene, footage from facility cameras, maintenance records, and witness statements help show what happened and why. Medical records connect injuries to the incident and establish the scope of treatment and recovery. Insurance coverage may include business policies, homeowner’s coverage, or product liability carriers, and each can affect how the claim proceeds. Minnesota’s comparative fault rules may also apply, potentially reducing recovery if multiple parties share responsibility. Early legal guidance helps secure key evidence, organize the story, and protect your interests while you focus on healing.
A go‑kart accident claim arises when someone is injured due to unsafe conditions, defective equipment, or careless operation on or around a track or recreational facility. These claims can involve track owners, event hosts, maintenance vendors, or manufacturers of karts and safety gear. The goal is to show that a duty existed, it was breached, and that breach caused your injuries and losses. Claims may include medical expenses, wage loss, rehabilitation, and pain and suffering. Even if you signed a waiver, Minnesota law may still allow recovery depending on how the incident occurred and the agreement’s language.
Strong cases rest on careful investigation and clear causation. We gather incident reports, maintenance logs, training policies, photographs, and witness accounts. We evaluate whether the track followed its own safety rules, provided proper supervision, and used equipment that met reasonable standards. We also review medical records to connect the mechanism of injury to your diagnosis. From there, we identify all insurance avenues and craft a demand supported by evidence and Minnesota law. If negotiations stall, we are prepared to file suit and continue building leverage through discovery, expert consultations as needed, and strategic motion practice.
Clear language helps you make informed choices. The following terms commonly appear in go‑kart injury cases in Breezy Point and across Minnesota. Understanding how they apply can frame your decisions about treatment, documentation, and settlement discussions. While every claim is unique, these concepts explain why certain records are requested, what insurers may argue, and how your actions after the incident can affect recovery. If a term or process feels confusing, ask questions—clarity early in the case often leads to better planning, fewer surprises, and a smoother path toward a resolution that reflects your needs.
Negligence is the failure to use reasonable care under the circumstances. In a go‑kart context, it can mean poor maintenance, inadequate supervision, unsafe track layouts, or ignoring known hazards. To prove negligence, you must show a duty existed, the duty was breached, and the breach caused your injuries and damages. Evidence might include policies, inspection records, witness accounts, and photographs. Minnesota’s comparative fault rules can reduce a recovery if multiple parties share blame, which makes a thorough review of the facts and consistent documentation vital to presenting a strong, well‑supported claim.
Assumption of risk is a defense that argues an injured person knowingly accepted certain hazards. In recreational settings, facilities may point to posted warnings or waivers. However, this does not give a free pass for careless behavior, hidden hazards, or equipment defects. The question is whether the harm flowed from dangers that were obvious and inherent to the activity, or from preventable conduct that fell below reasonable standards. Minnesota courts analyze the specific facts and the language of any documents. Careful evidence collection can help separate normal risks from avoidable, negligent conditions.
Premises liability focuses on the duty of property owners and operators to maintain reasonably safe conditions for visitors. In a go‑kart setting, this can include track design, lighting, surface traction, barrier placement, staffing levels, and timely response to known hazards. Claims often turn on whether the facility knew or should have known about a danger and failed to correct it or warn guests. Inspections, maintenance logs, and training records can be powerful evidence. When a preventable condition causes harm, Minnesota law allows injured visitors to pursue compensation for their resulting losses.
Comparative fault is a rule that allocates responsibility among everyone involved in an incident. If multiple parties share blame, a settlement or judgment can be adjusted according to each party’s percentage of fault under Minnesota law. Defendants and insurers often raise this concept to reduce payouts, which is why clear documentation and consistent medical care matter. Even if you believe you played a role, you may still recover damages if your share is not greater than the defendants’. A careful analysis of the facts helps guard against unfair fault assignments and protects your recovery.
Some claims resolve through an insurance negotiation backed by thorough documentation. Others require filing a lawsuit to obtain records, take depositions, and press for full value. The right path depends on liability clarity, injury severity, and available coverage. We evaluate whether a limited approach will achieve your goals or whether a more comprehensive strategy is needed. Either way, our process aims to reduce your stress, keep you informed, and protect deadlines. When evidence supports it, we prepare early for litigation so negotiations happen from a position of strength, not urgency.
If injuries are minor, liability is straightforward, and coverage is undisputed, a streamlined claim may resolve efficiently. In these situations, we focus on collecting essential records, confirming treatment plans, and presenting a concise demand. The goal is to avoid delays and unnecessary escalation while still capturing the full value of your medical bills, wage loss, and related impacts. Even with a limited approach, careful documentation and timely communications are important. Insurers will still look for gaps or inconsistencies, so we keep the file organized and proactive to encourage a fair, timely settlement.
When an incident results in property damage only, or very short‑lived symptoms that resolve quickly without ongoing care, a limited pathway can make sense. We verify the absence of lasting injury, gather proof of out‑of‑pocket expenses, and address the claim directly with the appropriate carrier. This approach aims to close the matter while preserving your time and resources. If new symptoms appear or facts change, the strategy can adapt. Early legal guidance ensures you do not inadvertently sign away rights or accept less than what Minnesota law allows for your situation.
If a facility denies responsibility, blames guests, or withholds records, comprehensive representation helps level the field. We seek maintenance logs, training materials, surveillance footage, and incident histories to reveal patterns and confirm what happened. Where track design, barriers, or staffing contributed to the crash, technical analysis may be appropriate. Detailed investigation strengthens negotiations and sets up litigation if needed. Our aim is to build a clear, evidence‑based story that holds the right parties accountable while guarding against attempts to shift fault or minimize the true impact of your injuries.
When injuries demand ongoing care, time away from work, or future treatment, a broader strategy can protect the value of your claim. We work with your providers to document diagnoses, limitations, and likely costs ahead. Accurately valuing future losses, household help, and reduced earning capacity requires careful attention. Insurers often press for quick, low settlements before the full picture is known. By pacing the claim with your recovery and collecting the right records, we present a demand that reflects both today’s needs and the lasting effects of the Breezy Point incident.
A comprehensive plan reduces uncertainty by addressing liability, damages, and insurance early. We identify all responsible parties, map available coverage, and develop a proof package that anticipates defenses. This preparation can increase negotiation leverage and shorten the timeline to a fair outcome. It also helps ensure that key evidence—like digital footage or inspection records—is preserved before it disappears. With a clear roadmap, you always know what comes next, what information is needed, and how decisions align with your goals and Minnesota law.
Thorough representation also protects against undervaluing future needs. We coordinate with your medical team to capture the full scope of care, including therapy, follow‑up visits, and activity limits that affect work and daily life. By combining medical documentation with witness statements, facility policies, and scene evidence, we present a consistent narrative grounded in facts. This approach supports meaningful settlement discussions and prepares the case for litigation if negotiations stall. Most importantly, it allows you to focus on recovery while we handle the details and deadlines that drive results.
Evidence can fade fast after a go‑kart crash. A comprehensive approach prioritizes early preservation—requesting surveillance footage, securing maintenance logs, and documenting the condition of karts, helmets, and barriers. We gather witness contact information, photograph the scene, and capture your immediate symptoms and limitations. This record not only supports liability but also strengthens causation, connecting the incident to your diagnosis. When insurers review the file, a well‑documented claim limits speculation and reduces opportunities to shift blame. Strong evidence is the foundation for fair negotiations and, if necessary, a successful litigation strategy.
Accurate valuation goes beyond current medical bills. We account for future treatment, time away from work, reduced duties, and the daily disruptions that follow an injury. A comprehensive plan aligns medical records, provider opinions, and your personal account to reflect the full impact of the Breezy Point crash. We also analyze multiple insurance policies to capture every available recovery path. By presenting a demand with clear documentation and reasoned support, we invite meaningful negotiations and reduce low offers based on incomplete or outdated information.
If it is safe, take wide and close photos of the kart, track surface, barriers, signage, and any fluids or debris. Ask for the incident report and the names of staff who responded. Politely request that the facility preserve surveillance footage and maintenance logs. Capture contact details for witnesses and note weather, lighting, and the timing of your ride. These steps can be done by a friend or family member if you need medical attention. Early documentation provides clarity, supports your memory, and can neutralize later disputes about how the crash unfolded.
Insurance adjusters may call quickly and request a recorded statement. Be polite, gather the caller’s information, and decline until you have legal guidance. Early statements can be used to downplay injuries or lock you into incomplete details before all facts are known. It is fine to exchange claim numbers and basic contact information, but hold off on interviews until you understand coverage, damages, and next steps. This simple boundary preserves your options, reduces avoidable disputes, and helps ensure that future communications reflect the full scope of your losses.
A dedicated injury attorney can organize your claim, safeguard deadlines, and handle communications so you can focus on recovery. We evaluate fault, identify all policies that may apply, and build a clear record of your medical treatment and financial losses. When negotiations begin, a structured file encourages fair offers and reduces delays. If litigation becomes necessary, your case is already grounded in strong documentation. For families in Breezy Point, having a local advocate means practical guidance, regular updates, and a strategy tailored to Minnesota law and your specific circumstances.
Insurance companies manage risk by minimizing payouts. An attorney provides balance by valuing the claim based on evidence, not assumptions. We coordinate with your providers to document diagnoses, restrictions, and future care, and we make sure out‑of‑pocket costs and wage losses are fully addressed. If multiple parties share responsibility, we allocate fault responsibly and protect your interests. From the first call to resolution, you receive straight talk, timely follow‑through, and a plan that matches your goals—whether that is a swift settlement or thorough preparation for court.
Go‑kart injuries can arise from a variety of preventable problems. Poorly maintained tracks or karts, inadequate supervision, and unsafe barriers can cause collisions or ejections. Defective components, such as steering mechanisms or braking systems, may fail under normal use. Staff may allow overcrowding, misuse of equipment, or riders who ignore posted rules, raising the risk for everyone on the course. In each situation, early evidence and medical documentation matter. By understanding how these circumstances interact, we can identify liable parties and pursue fair compensation under Minnesota law.
Facilities must keep the course reasonably safe, which includes appropriate barriers, clear sightlines, and surfaces with adequate traction. When corners are too tight, barriers are loose, or debris is left on the track, riders are exposed to avoidable danger. Maintenance logs, inspection schedules, and staff training materials can show whether the facility met reasonable standards. When conditions fall short, Minnesota premises liability law may allow recovery for resulting injuries. Thorough incident documentation—photos, videos, and witness names—helps demonstrate the connection between unsafe conditions and the harm you suffered in Breezy Point.
When a kart component fails, or safety gear such as seatbelts or helmets does not perform as intended, product liability principles may be involved. Evidence of prior repairs, recalls, or unusual wear can be telling. We examine whether the equipment was used normally, maintained properly, and free from dangerous defects. Manufacturers, distributors, and rental providers may all play roles in getting defective products into use. By preserving the equipment, photographing damage, and securing maintenance records, we can assess whether a defect contributed to the Breezy Point incident and pursue appropriate compensation.
Excessive speeds, unsafe passing, or allowing riders who ignore rules can lead to serious collisions. Staff must supervise appropriately, enforce safety policies, and remove riders who put others at risk. Witness statements, timing sheets, and any available footage can show patterns of careless operation. If the facility encouraged aggressive behavior or failed to intervene, liability may follow. Even when another rider caused the crash, the operator’s supervision practices may be relevant. Our team investigates how the event unfolded, evaluates responsibilities, and seeks fair compensation for the injuries and losses you sustained.
We combine attentive client service with diligent casework. From day one, you’ll know who is handling your matter, what to expect next, and how decisions affect timelines and outcomes. Our team understands the dynamics of recreational injury claims and the tactics insurers use to challenge them. We prioritize early evidence collection, clear communication with providers, and demands supported by solid documentation. This approach keeps your case moving, reduces surprises, and positions you to make informed choices about settlement or litigation as your recovery progresses.
Local knowledge matters. We work with Breezy Point families and visitors, understand Minnesota liability standards, and know how to request and review the records that drive value—maintenance logs, incident reports, and medical documentation. We also coordinate with your healthcare team to capture the full scope of your injuries and future needs. Whether your claim resolves through negotiation or requires litigation, our focus remains the same: protect your rights, present a fact‑driven case, and pursue compensation that reflects your real losses and the path forward.
You deserve a law firm that listens, explains options plainly, and follows through. We return calls, meet deadlines, and prepare each stage of your case with care. If a fair settlement is possible, we will pursue it efficiently. If the other side refuses to act reasonably, we are prepared to file suit and keep building leverage. At every turn, our role is to reduce your stress and advance your interests with steady advocacy and transparent communication. When questions arise, you will have clear answers and a responsive team.
We start by listening to your story and goals, then outline a plan tailored to the facts and Minnesota law. Next, we collect records, photographs, and witness accounts, and we request facility and insurance documents. Once your treatment picture is clearer, we prepare a demand that reflects medical costs, wage loss, and the personal impact of the Breezy Point incident. If negotiations stall, we file suit and continue building the case through discovery. Throughout, you’ll receive updates and guidance so you can make informed decisions with confidence.
Your first consultation focuses on clarity. We discuss what happened, review available records and photos, and identify your most urgent needs. We then map the case by listing likely sources of liability, potential insurance coverage, and immediate evidence requests. You will leave with a practical plan and a timeline for next steps. This early structure reduces stress, keeps communications organized, and ensures deadlines are protected while you receive the medical care needed to document injuries and guide the value of your claim.
We take time to understand your experience—how the crash occurred, what staff did afterward, the symptoms you feel, and your concerns about work and daily life. We also discuss expectations and what a successful outcome looks like for you. This conversation shapes the strategy, including which records to request and whether we need to move quickly to preserve video or scene conditions. By focusing on your priorities, we align the legal plan with the real‑world impact of the Breezy Point incident and your path to recovery.
We survey available evidence, including photographs, witness names, purchase receipts, and any messages with the facility. We also review potential policies—commercial liability, homeowner’s coverage, and product liability carriers—to understand the insurance landscape. Early requests to preserve surveillance footage and maintenance records are sent when appropriate. This groundwork informs whether a demand can be prepared efficiently or whether litigation planning should begin sooner. By organizing evidence at the start, we set the case up for clear storytelling and stronger negotiations later.
With a plan in place, we gather records, interview witnesses when needed, and evaluate the track’s safety policies and compliance. We review medical documentation to connect the mechanism of injury to your diagnosis and care. If liability is disputed, we seek additional materials, such as training manuals or prior incident data. This step turns facts into a compelling narrative that demonstrates how the Breezy Point crash occurred, why it was preventable, and what compensation is necessary to address both immediate and future losses.
We organize the file with medical records, billing statements, imaging, and provider notes. Photographs and video are cataloged to illustrate hazards, kart damage, and visible injuries. Witnesses can add context about speeds, staffing, and rule enforcement. When appropriate, we request policies, maintenance logs, and inspection documents from the facility and related vendors. This collection paints a full picture of the conditions that led to the incident and supports both the liability and damages portions of your claim under Minnesota law.
After assembling the evidence, we analyze how Minnesota negligence and premises liability rules apply. We assess the role of comparative fault and anticipate defenses such as assumption of risk or waiver language. Then we shape a strategy—either a focused demand when liability is clear or a litigation‑ready plan when disputes persist. In both paths, we emphasize consistency between medical records and your account of pain, limitations, and recovery. The goal is to present a credible, well‑supported claim that encourages fair resolution.
Once treatment stabilizes enough to value the claim, we prepare a detailed demand supported by records and Minnesota law. We negotiate with insurers and track developments closely. If offers do not reflect the evidence, we are prepared to file suit and continue building leverage through discovery. Throughout this stage, you receive clear updates and practical advice about options, timelines, and risks. Our readiness to litigate signals that your case will be taken seriously, which can lead to more meaningful settlement discussions.
We assemble medical bills, records, wage information, and a narrative summarizing how the Breezy Point incident changed your daily life. Photographs, incident reports, and key policy documents are included to support liability. We then engage the insurer with a demand that sets expectations and invites productive dialogue. During negotiations, we evaluate offers against the evidence and your goals, recommending counteroffers or next steps. Our focus remains steady: seek a resolution that reflects your full losses without unnecessary delay, while keeping all litigation options open.
If settlement talks stall, we file suit and move into discovery, where depositions and document requests can uncover critical details. We continue to refine the case with timelines, witness preparation, and targeted motions. Many matters still resolve before trial once the evidence is fully developed. If trial becomes necessary, you will be prepared and supported at each step. Our approach is consistent: build a persuasive, fact‑driven case and advocate for an outcome that addresses both present needs and the lasting effects of your injuries.
Start by ensuring safety and seeking medical attention. If you can, take photos of the track, karts, barriers, and any visible injuries. Ask staff for an incident report and politely request that surveillance footage and maintenance records be preserved. Gather names and contact information for witnesses, and note the time, lighting, and weather. Keep any receipts, wristbands, or tickets. Early documentation helps explain what happened and protects your claim while you focus on care. Next, contact a Minnesota injury law firm for guidance before speaking with insurers. A brief call can clarify coverage issues, outline important steps, and help prevent missteps that might harm your case. Avoid giving recorded statements until you understand your rights and the scope of your injuries. Follow medical recommendations, save all bills and records, and keep a simple journal of symptoms and limitations. These steps support both your health and the value of your claim.
Potentially liable parties can include the track owner or operator, event hosts, maintenance vendors, manufacturers and distributors of the kart or safety equipment, and sometimes other riders who operated carelessly. Responsibility depends on the facts: unsafe track design, poor supervision, defective components, or ignored hazards can all play a role. Identifying every responsible party matters because it can increase available insurance and improve your chances of a full recovery. To figure out who is responsible, we review maintenance logs, training policies, incident reports, photographs, and witness accounts. We also examine how the facility enforces safety rules, staffs the track, and responds to known hazards. If a product defect contributed to the crash, product liability principles may apply. When more than one party shares blame, Minnesota’s comparative fault rules can allocate responsibility. A thorough investigation helps ensure accountability is placed where it belongs.
A signed waiver can affect a claim, but it does not automatically end your rights. Minnesota law looks at the specific language and the circumstances of the incident. Waivers generally do not protect a facility from unsafe conditions that go beyond inherent risks of the activity, or from failures to maintain reasonably safe equipment. Nor do they excuse defects in karts or safety gear that cause preventable harm during normal use. We review waiver terms alongside the facts: track conditions, staffing, training, supervision, and the condition of equipment. If the harm resulted from avoidable hazards, careless conduct, or defective products, a claim may proceed despite a waiver. The key is showing how the injury arose and why it was preventable with reasonable care. Early evidence collection and medical documentation are essential to evaluate your options and present a well‑supported case.
Compensation typically includes medical expenses, wage loss, and other out‑of‑pocket costs, as well as non‑economic damages for pain, limitations, and how the injury affects daily life. The value depends on liability strength, the nature and duration of treatment, and the impact on work and activities. Future care, reduced duties, and long‑term limitations can significantly influence outcomes when supported by medical records and provider opinions. We work to present a clear valuation grounded in evidence. That includes detailed medical documentation, bills and ledgers, employer letters, and a narrative that connects the Breezy Point incident to the challenges you face. Insurers respond to credible, consistent files. By pacing the demand with your recovery and including future needs where appropriate, we seek a resolution that reflects today’s losses and the lasting effects tied to the crash.
High‑value evidence often includes photographs and video, incident reports, maintenance and inspection logs, and witness statements. Medical records and provider notes connect the mechanism of injury to your diagnosis and care. Proof of expenses, mileage, and wage loss provides a complete financial picture. When available, surveillance footage can be extremely helpful, so early requests to preserve it are important in recreational settings. We also look for communications with staff, safety policies, training materials, and any history of similar incidents. These documents help show whether the facility followed reasonable practices and whether hazards were ignored. Your own notes about pain, sleep, and limits at work or home add context that medical charts may not capture. Together, this evidence supports liability, causation, and damages—the pillars of a strong, persuasive claim under Minnesota law.
You can exchange basic information, but it is wise to avoid recorded statements until you have legal guidance. Adjusters aim to resolve claims quickly and at low cost, and early statements can lock you into incomplete details before your medical picture is clear. Be polite, request the caller’s name and claim number, and let them know your attorney will follow up. With counsel, communications are managed strategically. We ensure the information shared supports your claim and is timed appropriately with your treatment. This reduces the risk of misinterpretation and helps maintain leverage during negotiations. It also allows us to correct inaccuracies and supply context, which can be essential when liability is disputed or injuries evolve as you continue care after the Breezy Point incident.
Timelines vary widely. Some claims with clear liability and short treatment periods resolve in months, while cases with disputed fault, complex injuries, or multiple parties can take longer. Litigation can extend the process but may be necessary to obtain records, conduct depositions, and encourage fair settlement. We keep you updated on milestones and options at each stage so you can plan accordingly. Acting promptly helps preserve evidence and protect deadlines. Minnesota law imposes time limits for filing, and certain notices may be required depending on the parties involved. Early consultation lets us tailor a plan to your situation, pace negotiations with your recovery, and position the case for resolution at the right time—not before the full extent of your losses is understood.
Minnesota’s comparative fault rules may reduce recovery if multiple parties share responsibility. That means even if you believe you contributed to the incident, you may still have a viable claim depending on the facts and relative fault. Insurers often emphasize shared blame to limit payouts, which is why a careful review of the evidence is so important. We analyze track conditions, equipment performance, supervision, and compliance with rules to fairly allocate responsibility. Clear documentation—photos, witness accounts, and medical records—helps counter exaggerated fault claims. Our goal is to present an evidence‑based narrative that accurately reflects what happened in Breezy Point and supports the strongest possible recovery under Minnesota law.
Yes, children may pursue claims for injuries caused by negligence, and additional rules can apply to timelines and settlements. Because kids may not describe symptoms as clearly, prompt medical evaluation and follow‑up are especially important. Documentation should capture school or activity limitations and any recommendations for therapy or accommodations. We work with families to gather records, communicate with providers, and structure a claim that reflects both immediate needs and longer‑term considerations. When settlement discussions begin, the file should accurately reflect the child’s recovery path and future care. Our role is to guide the process with care, clarity, and steady advocacy tailored to a family’s needs.
We offer free consultations, and most injury cases are handled on a contingency fee, meaning legal fees are paid from a settlement or verdict. If there is no recovery, there is typically no attorney’s fee. We explain the agreement clearly at the start, including how costs such as records, filing fees, or experts are handled, so you know what to expect. Our goal is transparency. From the first call, you’ll understand how we are paid, how decisions affect expenses, and how to keep the case efficient. Clear communication about fees and costs helps you make informed choices while we focus on building a strong claim and pursuing fair compensation for your Breezy Point go‑kart injury.
