An ATV outing around Hopkins can turn quickly when a careless rider, faulty part, or unsafe property condition causes a crash. If you were hurt in Hennepin County, you may be facing medical bills, time away from work, and a confusing insurance process. Metro Law Offices helps injured riders and passengers pursue compensation under Minnesota law, guiding you from first call to resolution. Our team listens, investigates, and communicates with insurers so you can focus on healing. If you need direction after a Hopkins ATV accident, call 651-615-3322 to talk about your options and next steps.
This page explains how Minnesota ATV injury claims work, what evidence matters most in Hopkins cases, and when hiring a lawyer can make a meaningful difference. You will learn about liability, damages, insurance coverage, and common pitfalls that can reduce claim value. We also outline our process at Metro Law Offices, including investigation, documentation, negotiation, and litigation when needed. Whether your crash happened on a trail, a roadway crossing, or private land, understanding your rights early can help protect your health, your time, and your financial recovery.
ATV claims often involve unique issues: off-road rules, visibility concerns, property hazards, and multiple insurance policies. Early guidance helps preserve key evidence such as helmet damage, machine data, photographs, and witness contacts. It can also prevent avoidable mistakes, like recorded statements that minimize injuries or releases that waive claims too soon. With a knowledgeable advocate organizing medical records, calculating lost income, and addressing liens, your claim is presented clearly and on time. For people recovering from painful injuries, having someone manage the legal details can reduce stress and support a fair resolution.
Metro Law Offices represents injured Minnesotans in personal injury matters, including ATV and off-road crashes in Hopkins and across Hennepin County. We focus on careful case preparation, practical communication, and steady advocacy from intake through settlement or trial. Our approach emphasizes listening first, then building a case with medical documentation, scene evidence, and witness detail. We understand local venues and the expectations of insurers handling claims in Minnesota. Whether your injuries are moderate or significant, our goal is to pursue the most favorable outcome available while keeping you informed and supported at each step.
Legal representation for an ATV injury means having a dedicated advocate gather facts, analyze liability, and pursue compensation for medical care, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In Hopkins cases, responsibility may rest with another rider, a property owner, a maintenance contractor, or a manufacturer. Representation includes protecting deadlines, communicating with insurers, negotiating claims, and preparing for litigation when necessary. It also means coordinating medical records, bills, and insurance benefits in a way that clearly demonstrates the full impact of your injuries. Effective guidance aims to streamline a complex process and support your recovery.
Because ATVs are frequently operated off-road, coverage questions can be different from typical automobile crashes. Minnesota’s no-fault system often does not apply to off-road vehicles, so medical payments may come from health insurance, optional MedPay, or the liability carrier for the at-fault party. A careful review of every available policy—your own and theirs—can uncover benefits that help with treatment and recovery. An attorney can explain how comparative fault works, address property owner responsibilities, and evaluate any role defective parts may have played. The result is a clearer plan that protects your rights and moves your claim forward.
An ATV accident claim seeks compensation when someone’s negligence or a defective product causes injuries. Negligence may involve unsafe speed, failure to yield, impaired riding, or poor property maintenance. A product claim focuses on design or manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings. To succeed, the claim must connect the wrongful conduct to your injuries and losses, supported by medical and factual evidence. Recoverable damages can include medical expenses, wage loss, replacement services, and pain and suffering. Minnesota law also applies comparative fault rules, which may reduce recovery if an injured person shares some responsibility for the crash.
Most ATV cases follow a sequence: investigation, documentation, demand, negotiation, and sometimes litigation. Investigation preserves photos, onboard tech, scene measurements, and witness statements. Documentation compiles medical records, bills, and employment details to show the full impact of injuries. A demand package explains liability and damages to the insurer, setting the stage for negotiation. If the insurer disputes fault or value, litigation may be filed to hold parties accountable. Throughout, deadlines must be tracked carefully. A methodical approach helps avoid gaps in proof, protects credibility, and improves your position at the settlement table or in court.
Clear language helps you make informed choices. The terms below are common in Minnesota ATV injury cases and often determine how a claim unfolds. They address responsibility for a crash, how long you have to file, and which insurance policies may contribute to your recovery. As you review these concepts, remember that facts drive outcomes: where the crash happened, who controlled the property, how the machines were operated, and which coverages are in place. Understanding these building blocks can help you discuss strategy and ask the right questions during your claim.
Minnesota follows a modified comparative fault rule. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, and you cannot recover if you are more at fault than the other party or parties combined. In ATV claims, insurers often argue that riders share responsibility due to speed, visibility, or terrain. Careful investigation can counter unfair allocations with photos, witness accounts, helmet evidence, and machine data. Even when partial responsibility exists, a well-documented claim can still lead to meaningful compensation, provided your share of fault does not exceed the threshold under Minnesota law.
Minnesota’s no-fault system typically applies to motor vehicles, and many ATVs fall outside that framework unless specially insured. As a result, medical bills after an ATV crash often run through health insurance, optional MedPay, or the at-fault party’s liability coverage. Policies differ, so reviewing your declarations and any recreational endorsements is important. Coordination matters because multiple payers can create liens or subrogation rights. Prompt notice to all carriers helps preserve benefits and avoid denials. Knowing which coverage pays first—and how to document treatment—can reduce delays and out-of-pocket costs during recovery.
Minnesota generally allows up to six years to file a negligence claim for personal injury, though some claims have shorter deadlines. Product liability, wrongful death, and claims against governmental entities may involve different timeframes and notice rules. Because ATV incidents can raise multiple legal theories, identifying every applicable deadline early is essential. Evidence also fades quickly, so waiting can weaken a case even when time technically remains. A timely consultation helps confirm the correct statute, preserve proof, and avoid losing your right to pursue compensation due to an expired filing period.
UM/UIM coverage helps when the at-fault driver or rider has no insurance or too little to cover your losses. Some Minnesota policies may extend UM/UIM to off-road incidents depending on definitions, endorsements, and whether an ATV is treated as a motor vehicle under the policy. Because wording varies, a careful policy review is vital. If coverage applies, it can provide additional funds for medical costs, wage loss, and pain and suffering. UM/UIM claims have specific notice requirements and procedures, so early action helps secure benefits and avoid technical defenses from insurers.
After an ATV crash, you can handle the claim yourself, hire a lawyer for guidance and negotiation, or pursue litigation if settlement stalls. A self-managed claim might be appropriate for minor injuries and clear fault, but insurers may still undervalue pain and future care. Hiring counsel to assemble medical proof and address liability can improve clarity and reduce delays. Litigation can be necessary when the insurer disputes facts, damages, or coverage. The best path depends on injury severity, insurance limits, and your comfort managing paperwork, deadlines, and negotiations while you recover.
If the crash caused only minor injuries that resolved quickly with minimal treatment, and the at-fault party’s liability is straightforward and admitted, a limited approach can work. Strong documentation—scene photos, prompt medical records, and itemized bills—allows you to present a simple, complete package. Be sure to include proof of any short-term wage loss and out-of-pocket costs. Keep communications concise and avoid recorded statements that invite minimization. If an insurer responds reasonably and pays within policy limits, a limited strategy may resolve the claim without extended negotiations or court involvement.
When there are no bodily injuries, no medical bills, and only repair or replacement issues, pursuing a property damage claim directly with the insurer can be efficient. Providing multiple repair estimates, clear photos, proof of equipment upgrades, and depreciation details helps. Confirm whether custom parts, accessories, and riding gear are covered and at what value. Keep receipts and serial numbers handy. If an offer is fair and timely, accepting it can close the matter quickly. If not, targeted assistance from an attorney may improve valuation without escalating into full litigation.
Fractures, head injuries, spinal symptoms, or surgery create layers of proof that insurers scrutinize. Treatment plans evolve, specialists get involved, and billing becomes complicated. A comprehensive approach coordinates records, imaging, provider opinions, and future care estimates so damages are fully captured. It also addresses health insurance liens and subrogation, which can significantly affect your net recovery. When injuries are significant, settlement timing matters; resolving too early may leave essential costs uncovered. Thorough representation helps pace the claim with your medical progress and builds a clearer picture of long-term impact.
Many ATV crashes involve conflicting accounts, visibility issues, and complex property rules. If fault is contested or multiple policies may apply—homeowner’s, recreational, umbrella, or UM/UIM—a deeper strategy is needed. Comprehensive representation secures statements, consults with appropriate experts when beneficial, and reviews policy language to locate all available coverage. It also prepares for litigation if the insurer refuses to evaluate the evidence fairly. With clear timelines, preserved proof, and organized damages, your claim stands on firmer ground during negotiations and in court, improving the path toward a fair resolution.
A comprehensive strategy ensures nothing important is overlooked. It aligns investigation with medical recovery, documents every category of loss, and addresses known defenses early. This organization can increase negotiating power and reduce surprise arguments late in the process. It also allows your case to transition smoothly into litigation, if required, without starting over. Clear communication with providers and insurers helps keep bills moving and records complete. For many Hopkins riders, this approach offers peace of mind, letting them focus on healing while their claim progresses with purpose and structure.
Another benefit is accuracy in valuation. Future care, reduced earning capacity, and long-term symptoms are often underestimated when a claim is rushed. A thorough review of treatment, prognosis, and daily limitations guides appropriate timing for settlement discussions. It also helps identify additional insurance that may apply, such as umbrella coverage or UM/UIM, improving the chance of full compensation within available limits. When the process is transparent and evidence-driven, negotiations often become more productive, and you are better positioned to make informed decisions about settlement versus litigation.
Thorough development connects the dots between the crash and your day-to-day reality. It compiles treatment notes, diagnostic imaging, and provider opinions to demonstrate the full scope of injury. It also includes wage records, employer statements, and documentation of household services you can no longer perform. With this foundation, valuation is based on facts rather than assumptions. Insurers may still challenge causation or necessity of care, but organized proof reduces leverage for low offers. This methodical approach supports fairer outcomes and provides a clear record if a judge or jury must decide.
Managing phone calls, forms, and deadlines while you are injured is exhausting. A comprehensive approach shifts the administrative load away from you. Your legal team coordinates records, tracks appointments, handles insurer communications, and keeps you updated. With fewer interruptions, you can attend therapy, follow provider recommendations, and get back to daily life. Clear guidance on next steps reduces uncertainty, and careful timing helps avoid settling before the true impact of your injuries is known. The result is a calmer process that supports both recovery and a well-documented claim.
Safety comes first. Once immediate hazards are addressed, photograph the area from several angles, including ruts, debris, skid patterns, and any trail signage. Capture the position of machines, damage points, and helmet condition. Note lighting, weather, and surface conditions. Collect names and contact details for witnesses and property owners, and save ride apps or GPS data if available. Avoid moving damaged parts until they can be inspected. Small details can become powerful evidence later, especially when an insurer questions visibility, speed, or the layout of the crash scene.
Insurers often request recorded statements soon after a crash. While being cooperative is important, early statements can unintentionally minimize injuries or overlook details you recall later. Ask for questions in writing when possible, provide only accurate facts, and avoid guessing about speed or distances. Keep a copy of anything you submit. Before signing medical authorizations, confirm the scope and time period. Narrow releases protect your privacy and limit fishing expeditions. If you feel pressured or unsure, consider speaking with an attorney at Metro Law Offices to understand your rights before proceeding.
ATV claims can involve multiple insurers, disputed liability, and questions about whether no-fault benefits apply. A lawyer helps identify responsible parties, gather evidence, and present a complete damages picture. This can reduce delays and improve the accuracy of settlement valuations. In serious cases, guidance ensures that future care, wage loss, and long-term limitations are fully considered before negotiations begin. If an insurer denies or lowballs your claim, representation creates a pathway to litigation so facts can be tested and rights protected under Minnesota law.
Legal help also provides practical support while you recover. Your team can coordinate medical records, track deadlines, manage lien issues, and communicate with adjusters. Clear updates let you focus on treatment rather than paperwork. If multiple coverages may apply—homeowner’s, recreational, or UM/UIM—your lawyer can analyze policy language to unlock additional benefits. The right strategy balances timeliness with thorough documentation, helping avoid premature settlements and promoting a fair result. For Hopkins riders, a steady advocate can make the process more manageable from start to finish.
Many Hopkins ATV cases arise from collisions on shared trails, roadway crossings, or private land. Some involve another rider’s unsafe speed or failure to yield; others stem from property hazards like hidden drop-offs, unmarked obstacles, or negligent maintenance. Equipment failures—brakes, throttle, or steering—can point to defective parts or improper service. Poor visibility, dust, and changing terrain also play a role, making witness statements and photos important. Because each scenario raises distinct liability and insurance issues, tailored investigation is key to identifying fault and pursuing the compensation you deserve.
On narrow or winding trails, conflicts over right-of-way and safe speed are common. When one rider crosses the center, exits a blind turn too fast, or fails to yield at a junction, serious injuries can follow. In these cases, evidence of trail markings, visibility, and rider positioning matters. Helmet and machine damage can clarify angles of impact. Witness accounts help establish who saw what and when. If signage was missing or obstructed, property maintenance may also be at issue. Putting these details together strengthens liability arguments and supports fair compensation.
Mechanical failures—such as brake fade, throttle sticking, or steering defects—can cause sudden loss of control. When equipment fails, the focus shifts to design, manufacturing, warnings, and maintenance. Preserving the machine and parts is vital so qualified professionals can evaluate what went wrong. Keep purchase records, recall notices, and service history. If a helmet or safety gear fails unexpectedly, save it as well. Product claims are evidence-intensive and require careful handling to maintain chain of custody. Thorough evaluation can uncover manufacturer or supplier responsibility and additional insurance avenues.
ATV riding on private property can involve hazards like concealed holes, unmarked cables, broken gates, or poorly maintained trails. Minnesota premises liability law examines the property owner’s knowledge of dangers and whether reasonable steps were taken to warn or fix them. Photos, measurements, and witness statements are particularly useful. If permission to ride was granted, the terms and any posted rules may affect responsibility. Insurance coverage may include homeowner’s or farm policies. A focused investigation helps determine whether negligent property conditions contributed to the crash and which insurers must respond.
We focus on clear communication and careful case building. From day one, we gather the facts, review insurance policies, and coordinate with your providers. You will know what to expect at each stage, including how long steps usually take and what documentation is needed. Our approach emphasizes practical guidance that protects your time and your claim. When questions arise, you will have direct access to a team that understands how Minnesota law applies to ATV crashes and what evidence persuades insurers and juries.
Complex coverage questions are common in off-road incidents. We analyze relevant policies to identify all available benefits, including homeowner’s, recreational, umbrella, and potential UM/UIM. We also address liens and subrogation to protect your net recovery. If the insurer disputes liability or damages, we prepare your case for litigation while continuing to pursue a fair settlement. Throughout, you receive regular updates and honest evaluations so you can make informed decisions about settlement timing and trial strategy.
Your recovery is the priority. We handle paperwork, insurer communications, and evidence management so you can focus on medical care and family. When the time is right, we present a comprehensive demand rooted in records, bills, and future care assessments. If an agreement cannot be reached, we are prepared to file suit and advocate in court. Our aim is a fair result achieved through steady preparation, thoughtful negotiation, and, when needed, firm litigation to protect your rights.
Every case begins with listening. We learn your story, gather the key facts, and assess coverage. Next, we secure evidence, coordinate medical records, and create a timeline that connects the crash to your injuries. We keep you updated as we assemble a demand package and negotiate with insurers. If a fair resolution isn’t offered, we discuss filing suit and prepare for litigation while continuing settlement efforts. The process is designed to be transparent and manageable so you know what’s happening, why it matters, and what comes next.
We start by understanding how the crash happened, your medical needs, and your goals. Then we identify all responsible parties and applicable insurance. Evidence is preserved quickly: scene photos, gear and machine condition, witness details, and any available digital data. We also notify insurers and begin collecting medical records and bills. Early coordination sets the tone for the claim and helps prevent disputes over missing information. With the right foundation, we can shape a clear narrative of liability and damages from the outset.
During intake, we walk through the crash step by step, noting terrain, weather, speed, and visibility. We identify key locations, property ownership, and any signage. Your symptoms, treatment to date, and work impact are also documented. With your permission, we contact witnesses and request incident reports if available. By building a detailed timeline, we can align events with injuries and anticipate insurer arguments. This early clarity helps determine which evidence to prioritize and which policies are most likely to provide coverage.
We gather medical records, imaging, and billing, along with employment verification for any wage loss. Photos of the scene, helmet, and ATV are organized, and we request maintenance histories if equipment failure is suspected. We also review your insurance declarations for MedPay, UM/UIM, or umbrella coverage. With these materials, we outline an early strategy covering liability proof, damages development, and communication protocols with insurers. Establishing a plan now helps pace the claim with your medical recovery and positions you for effective negotiations later.
As treatment progresses, we update records, track expenses, and document daily limitations. When your condition stabilizes or sufficient information is available, we prepare a demand package explaining how the crash occurred, why the other party is responsible, and the full scope of your damages. This includes medical summaries, wage loss proof, and future care considerations. We negotiate with insurers to pursue a fair settlement. If they dispute liability or undervalue the claim, we advise on options, up to and including filing suit in Hennepin County.
We organize treatment notes, therapy records, and diagnostic studies to present a clear picture of injury and recovery. Provider statements may explain causation, limitations, and prognosis. For wage loss, employer letters, pay stubs, and tax records help quantify missed income and reduced capacity. We also track mileage, out-of-pocket costs, and replacement services. Together, these materials demonstrate the real-life impact of the crash and support an informed, well-supported settlement discussion with the insurer.
We handle adjuster communications to reduce interruptions and protect your claim. Once documentation is ready, we send a detailed demand letter outlining liability, injuries, medical expenses, wage loss, and pain and suffering, supported by exhibits. We set a reasonable response timeline and continue dialogue to address questions. Negotiations may involve counteroffers and additional proof. Throughout, we provide candid updates and recommendations so you can decide whether to settle or proceed toward litigation based on the strength of the evidence and your goals.
If negotiations stall, we may file suit to move the case forward while continuing to explore resolution. Litigation includes pleadings, discovery, and, when appropriate, mediation. Many cases still settle before trial after both sides evaluate the evidence more fully. When a settlement is reached, we finalize releases, address liens and subrogation, and arrange disbursement. If trial becomes necessary, we prepare you for each step. Whether in settlement or court, our aim is to present a clear, compelling case grounded in facts and documentation.
Litigation begins with filing and serving the complaint, followed by discovery. This phase exchanges information through written questions, document requests, and depositions. We work with you to prepare truthful, consistent responses and gather any additional materials requested. Discovery helps clarify disputed facts, test liability theories, and refine damages. As the record develops, settlement opportunities often improve because both sides better understand the risks of trial. We continue to negotiate while building a credible presentation for court.
Many cases resolve at mediation, where a neutral mediator facilitates settlement discussions. We present your case, address defenses, and advocate for a fair number supported by evidence. If agreement is reached, we finalize paperwork, confirm lien amounts, and ensure accurate distribution of funds. We will explain timelines, tax considerations, and any remaining steps. If mediation does not resolve the matter, we continue preparing for trial while keeping settlement options open. Our goal is a result that reflects the full impact of your injuries and respects your recovery.
Minnesota generally provides up to six years for negligence-based personal injury claims, but some ATV-related cases can involve shorter timelines. Product liability, wrongful death, and claims against governmental entities may have different statutes and notice requirements. Because multiple theories can arise from a single crash, identifying every applicable deadline early is essential. Missing a limitation can end your claim regardless of its strength. Beyond the statute of limitations, practical timelines matter. Evidence fades quickly: trails change, memories dim, and damaged parts get discarded. Prompt action helps preserve photos, witness contacts, machine data, and medical documentation that connect the accident to your injuries. If you have questions about timing, a quick consultation can clarify the deadlines that apply to your specific situation and safeguard your right to pursue compensation.
Many ATVs are not covered under Minnesota’s no-fault system, which was designed primarily for motor vehicles operated on public roads. That means personal injury protection benefits may not be available for an off-road crash. Instead, medical bills often route through health insurance, optional MedPay, or liability coverage from the at-fault party. Policy language varies, so a careful review of your declarations and endorsements is important. Even when no-fault does not apply, other insurance can help. Homeowner’s, recreational, umbrella, and sometimes UM/UIM coverages may contribute depending on the facts and policy terms. Coordinating benefits matters because different insurers can assert reimbursement rights. Early notice, accurate documentation, and strategic communication increase the chance that available coverages respond promptly to support your treatment and recovery.
You may pursue compensation for medical expenses, wage loss, loss of earning capacity, and reasonable replacement services if injuries limit what you can do at home. Pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life are also recognized damages in Minnesota. In some cases, future medical care and long-term symptoms must be considered to avoid settling for too little too soon. The value of a claim depends on liability proof, the nature and duration of your injuries, medical documentation, and available insurance limits. Detailed records, consistent treatment, and clear evidence linking the crash to your symptoms strengthen negotiations. If an insurer disputes causation or downplays your losses, litigation may be necessary to secure a fair result. A tailored strategy helps present your damages in a clear, persuasive way.
Minnesota follows a modified comparative fault system. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, and you cannot recover if you are more at fault than the other party or parties combined. Insurers often argue shared responsibility in ATV crashes due to speed, terrain, or visibility. Careful scene documentation and witness accounts can counter unfair allocations. Even when some responsibility exists, you may still recover compensation so long as your fault does not exceed the threshold. An organized presentation of evidence—photos, helmet and machine damage, medical records, and a consistent timeline—can improve outcomes. If the insurer’s allocation seems unfair, negotiation, mediation, or trial may be needed to resolve the dispute and reach a more accurate assessment of fault.
Be cautious. Adjusters are trained to gather statements that may minimize injuries or shift responsibility. Provide only accurate facts, avoid speculation about speed or distances, and decline recorded statements until you understand the implications. You can ask for questions in writing and respond after reviewing your notes or speaking with counsel. If you choose to communicate, keep it brief and stick to the essentials: date, location, parties involved, and property details. Do not sign broad medical authorizations that allow access to unrelated history. Narrow, time-limited releases protect your privacy. If discussions become uncomfortable or you feel pressured, you have the right to pause and seek guidance from a lawyer who can communicate on your behalf.
A thorough investigation starts with preserving the scene as much as possible: photos of terrain, tracks, and obstacles; positions of machines; and helmet or gear damage. Witness interviews and any available ride apps or GPS data can clarify speed and location. If equipment failure is suspected, the ATV and parts should be secured for inspection and kept in their post-crash condition. Medical documentation is equally important. Prompt evaluation links injuries to the event, while ongoing records demonstrate severity and recovery. We also review property ownership, trail rules, and signage. Insurance policy analysis identifies available coverage, including homeowner’s, recreational, umbrella, and potential UM/UIM. Together, these steps create a fact-based narrative that supports liability and damages during negotiations and, if necessary, in court.
Crashes on private property raise premises liability questions. Minnesota law examines whether the property owner knew or should have known about a dangerous condition and whether reasonable steps were taken to warn or fix it. Unmarked cables, hidden holes, or poorly maintained trails can create significant hazards. Photos, measurements, and witness statements help establish the property’s condition at the time. Permission to ride and any posted rules may affect responsibility. Insurance coverage may come from homeowner’s or farm policies, depending on the land and the activities allowed. A timely investigation is vital because owners can change conditions after an incident. The faster we document the area, the easier it is to fairly evaluate responsibility and pursue compensation.
Yes, if a defective part contributed to the crash or increased the severity of your injuries, a product liability claim may be available. These cases focus on design defects, manufacturing errors, or inadequate warnings. Keeping the ATV and failed components in their post-crash state is essential so qualified professionals can examine them. Purchase records, maintenance history, and recall notices can also be important. Product claims are evidence-intensive and may involve multiple companies across the supply chain. Insurance coverage and legal standards differ from negligence cases, and deadlines can vary. A careful review helps determine whether a product theory should be pursued alongside or instead of other claims. If viable, these claims can provide an additional path to compensation for your losses.
Timeframes vary based on injury severity, insurer responsiveness, and whether litigation becomes necessary. Straightforward claims with clear fault and stable medical records may resolve within several months after treatment plateaus. Complex cases—significant injuries, disputed liability, or multiple insurers—often take longer because additional documentation, evaluations, or depositions are required. Rushing can leave future care or long-term symptoms undervalued. We balance timeliness with thorough proof so negotiations start when the claim is ready. If settlement is not fair, litigation can extend the timeline but may be the best path to a just result. Throughout, we provide updates so you understand what is happening and why each step matters for your recovery.
We typically work on a contingency fee in ATV injury cases. That means you do not pay attorney’s fees unless we recover compensation for you. During your consultation, we explain the fee structure, costs, and how expenses such as records, experts, or filing fees are handled. Transparency helps you decide whether moving forward makes sense for your situation. If we accept your case, we invest time and resources to build it properly. At the end of the matter, fees and case costs are deducted from the recovery, and any liens are addressed before funds are disbursed to you. We will walk through the settlement statement line by line so you understand each item and the net amount you will receive.
